ÃÛÌÒ½´Methodist University (SMU) has . This commitment was manifested at the opening of the Women’s Building (later Atkins Hall), which was constructed in 1912 as a companion building to the iconic Dallas Hall when ÃÛÌÒ½´opened. Atkins Hall was the scene of both women’s and men’s on-campus living experience for many years before being retired as a residence hall in 1959. Following Atkins Hall’s retirement, , where students continue to take classes today.
Since those early years, 18 permanent residence halls were constructed between 1926 and 1964, housing around 2,500 students. How these halls are used has evolved over the years. From 1920 to 2013, ÃÛÌÒ½´employed a traditional on-campus housing operation that in more recent years catered primarily to first-year students. Over time, residential buildings were repurposed to serve academic functions. By the time the idea of the Residential Commons entered the scene, ÃÛÌÒ½´could house a little over 1,500 students in traditional residence halls or within a limited number of themed communities, including Honors, Engineering, Fine Arts, and Service housing.
Around 2006, senior campus leaders, including President R. Gerald Turner, Vice President for Student Affairs Lori White, and Provost Paul Ludden, sought solutions to a variety of campus issues that, if addressed, could increase retention rates and improve the overall student experience on the Hilltop. Various task force recommendations were put forward to , retention, honors programming, on-campus housing, the first-year experience, the development of a sense of community, and the desire to integrate academic and social elements of the University.
In the lead-up to the decision to implement the Residential Commons system, University leaders collectively came to the agreement that a drastic change in the residential experience at ÃÛÌÒ½´could have a significant effect on improving campus life. In writing about the rationale for the shift to the RC system, ÃÛÌÒ½´student Jamie Hinz said, “...on the most general level, . . . a culture shift is needed at this point in the University’s history. Such a culture shift would involve two separate but closely related dimensions: social and academic. Changes in either dimension will affect the other.”
A group of students, called the Residential Commons Leadership Corps, was created and tasked with developing the foundation and framework of what would become the initial 11 Residential Commons at SMU. Further information regarding the process of implementing and transition to the Residential Commons system at ÃÛÌÒ½´is detailed in .
SMU’s integrated campus housing follows a and is a distinctive feature of the University. ÃÛÌÒ½´designed the Residential Commons for students to integrate their academic, residential, and social experience and, subsequently, cultivate a sense of belonging to the University. While the Residential Commons are a housing system at their core, they truly embrace the ÃÛÌÒ½´experience since their founding in 2014.
The decision to implement the Residential Commons system was not only novel for ÃÛÌÒ½´but also for the national higher education profession. ÃÛÌÒ½´became renowned among its peer institutions of higher education for its all-in approach to implementing the residential college model. Normally, the conversion to a residential college model is a slow, gradual process, but thanks to generous contributions from the ÃÛÌÒ½´community and a profound commitment from the University leadership, the entire first- and second-year residential experience was transformed over the course of one summer. In the years since, ÃÛÌÒ½´has continued to be consulted by institutions wishing to operationalize a residential college model on their own campus.
To accomplish the transformation to the new Residential Commons system, a number of significant physical and organizational changes were implemented. First, an was made by the University following substantial contributions by ÃÛÌÒ½´donors, leading to the construction of 5 new residential buildings and the renovation of 8 existing residential buildings to create 11 new communities. Additionally, a new two-year live-on requirement was put in place to underscore the importance of the residential experience at SMU. Finally, a Faculty-in-Residence program was created to connect faculty at ÃÛÌÒ½´directly with residential students by creating avenues for closer interaction and community-building.
In academic year 2019–2020, which marked the completion of five years of the Residential Commons at SMU, a thorough review of the philosophical mission of the Residential Commons model was completed. This resulted in .